Tweeter button
Facebook button
Technorati button
Myspace button
Linkedin button
Delicious button
Digg button
Stumbleupon button
Newsvine button
Youtube button
You are here: Morethan Creative - experts in social media »

Tag : Fresno Social Media

Facebook Friending Made Simple: Just Shake Your iPhone

Ever wanted to Facebook friend someone you just met right on the spot? Until today, that wasn’t easy. But now, if you have an iPhone, all it takes is a single bump, courtesy of the Bump iPhone app.

For those of you unfamiliar with the app, Bump allows you to share contact information with friends simply by bumping your phone once with another friend’s phone (note: they much touch to work, you can’t just shake it in the air). The app then connects your iPhones and transfer contact information like phone numbers and addresses (for more, read our original review).

Now a new update to the app has brought it a couple of new features, but the one people will be talking about though is the Facebook integration. If you link your Facebook account to Bump and swap contact information with another person who has done the same, you can choose right then and there to initiate a friend request. Once done, a prompt will appear where the other party can accept or deny the friend request.

Jake Mintz, Co-Founder of Bump Technologies, told me that he and his team worked closely with Facebook to make this happen. He’s “pretty sure” that Bump’s the first app that can initiate and accept friend requests; we can’t think of any mobile apps off the top of our heads that do, so we think it’s likely Bump is the first.

Along with the Facebook integration, Bump now boasts custom profiles, which gives users more control over the contact information they share when “bumping” or create frequently-used share settings such as “work,” “personal,” or “fake” (just in case you can’t shake off that persistent and annoying guy/girl at the bar).

Jake says that this is the first of many social media integrations that will come to Bump. So yes, you can expect the ability to follow the people you meet via Twitter just by bumping iPhones in the near future.

Google Buzz: 5 Opportunities for Small Businesses

This post originally appeared on the American Express OPEN Forum, where Mashable regularly contributes articles about leveraging social media and technology in small business.

Just when you thought you had social media figured out,GoogleGoogle has shaken things up with a new entrant into the market: Google BuzzGoogle Buzz. It’s integrated into GmailGmail, which means right out of the gate it potentially has an audience of tens of millions of people. As such, it could eventually prove as important to your business as the other services we’ve seen prosper in the past few years.

If you’ve spent much time on social media sites, many of the features will look familiar, as Buzz combines elements of TwitterTwitterFacebookFacebook, and the quickly rising FoursquareFoursquare. But there are some subtleties that make Buzz unique, and in turn create opportunities that you should familiarize yourself with –- if not start to take advantage of –- as soon as possible.


1. Gathering Customer Feedback


Like Twitter, Buzz lets you post a message to a group of “followers” that subscribe to your updates. However, there are a few differences, namely that messages can be longer than 140 characters (and include supporting images and links) and that replies are all grouped under the original message. This makes conversations easier to track and follow up on. There are also built-in features to reply in a one-on-one way, via either e-mail or Google Talk.


2. Engaging With Others


If you use Gmail, there’s a good chance you already have a built-in network on Google Buzz. The service helps you get started by letting you connect with those you e-mail or chat with frequently. Once you’re following some people, clicking the “Buzz” link from Gmail’s main navigation will let you see their most recent updates. You can comment on them, “like” them, or follow up personally with an e-mail or chat message.


3. Collaboration


Buzz can be used both for broadcasting a message to all of your followers and to select groups of them. If you’ve already set up Groups in Gmail, they’re already available in Buzz. If not, you can create new ones on-the-fly. Posting a private message on Buzz works exactly the same as posting a public one – you just select the Group you want to be able to see it, and then only those people will be able to view and comment on it. It’s instant, private collaboration.


4. Marketing


It’s too soon to tell whether Buzz will have the type of impact for brick-and-mortar businesses that services like Yelp and increasingly Foursquare have had, but it has a very similar feature set. Users can “check in” at business locations, in turn notifying their followers of their whereabouts. Thus, encouraging your customers to check in on Buzz (and other location-based services) can be a way to drive free word-of-mouth marketing for your business.


5. Sharing Content


collaboration imageJust like Twitter and Facebook, Buzz has the potential to be a powerful medium for sharing content. You can use it to share blog posts, special deals, or interesting links related to your niche. Just like other social media services, you shouldn’t overdo it though – you want to mix promotional messages with a balance of other useful information and conversation for your followers.

So is it time to jump head first into Buzz? At this point, the right answer is probably “not so fast.” While Buzz clearly has some promising use cases, it’s also not yet ideally designed for businesses. There are no business accounts, no multi-user support, and a host of privacy issues that nearly derailed the service in its first couple weeks (though Google has been quick to address them).

Buzz will likely become more viable for businesses when a Google Apps version is offered, as well as a standalone service that can be accessed by anyone outside of Gmail – both of which are reportedly in the works. Nonetheless, familiarizing yourself with Buzz’s features and opportunities now could be immensely valuable in the future, while at the present, it can provide some useful additional functionality for Gmail users and their contacts.


Google Execs Convicted in Italian Privacy Case | Governance | ITBusinessEdge.com

Google Execs Convicted in Italian Privacy Case Feb 24, 2010 9:27:43 AM

According to The New York Timesan Italian court has convicted three Google executives of violating privacy laws for allowing a 2006 video of students bullying an autistic boy to air on the now-defunct Google Video site.

David Drummond, Google’s senior vice president and chief legal officer; Peter Fleischer, Google’s chief privacy counsel; and George Reyes, the company’s former chief financial officer, were sentenced to six months in prison. As The Wall Street Journal reports, the three don’t face extradition or jail timebecause Italy automatically suspends prison sentences of less than three years.

The ruling sets a legal precedent in Europe as to whether Internet companies can be held legally liable for content that is posted on video sites by third parties. BusinessWeek quotes Greg Sterling, an analyst at Sterling Market Intelligence, as saying:

It’s a bad decision. It sets a bad precedent. The individuals didn’t have any control over the private parties involved in the underlying dispute.

Certainly, as V3.co.uk notes, David Drummond agrees:

If individuals like myself and my Google colleagues, who had nothing to do with the harassing incident, its filming or its uploading onto Google Video, can be held criminally liable solely by virtue of our positions at Google, every employee of any Internet hosting service faces similar liability.

Google is no stranger to privacy issues. Its Street View service has drawn the ire of many, including Switzerland, which announced plans to sue Google for failing to obscure faces, license plates and other sensitive images. More recently, Google Buzz is creating a fair amount of rancor. The Electronic Privacy Information Center has filed a complaint with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission claiming that Google Buzz violates user privacy.

Web Faceoff: Adobe Flash vs. HTML5

Web Faceoff: Adobe Flash vs. HTML5

Every week, we pit two web apps or companies against each other in our web faceoff series. In the past, we’ve put Android vs. iPhoneDigg vs. Reddit, and Windows 7 vs. Snow Leopardorder to see which one was truly the people’s choice.

This week, we’re tweaking the competitors a bit. Over the last few weeks, you may have heard about a battle brewing between Adobeadobe AIR and Apple. It all started when Apple slyly revealed that the iPad would not support Flash.

This quickly broke out into a heated debate: Should we be abandoning Flash for HTML5, the new version of the web’s mark-up language that can support video, audio and more? Steve Jobs certainly thinks so.

Now with more people chiming in, we think it’s time to take the pulse of the people.

Which will eventually win out in the end: Adobe Flash or HTML5? Which is better for the future of the web? Do you think Apple has the muscle to take down Adobe’s widely used plug-in?

Make your choice in the poll below, which will close on Friday, February 27, at 12:00 p.m. PT. Then let us know your opinions on this matter in the comments.

Who would win in a fight: Adobe Flash or HTML5?







Faceoff Series: Overall Results


Week 1:
Mozilla Firefox vs. Google Chrome
WINNER: Firefox, 4600 votes (Chrome: 3310 votes, Tie: 911 votes)

Week 2:
Tumblr vs. Posterous
WINNER: Tumblr, 1809 votes (Posterous: 1496 votes, Tie: 256 votes)

Week 3:
Pandora vs. Last.fm
WINNER: Last.fm, 1187 votes (Pandora: 1156 votes, Tie: 122 votes)

Week 4:
Twitter vs. Facebook
WINNER: Facebook, 2484 votes (Twitter: 2061 votes, Tie: 588 votes)

Week 5:
WordPress vs. Typepad
WINNER: WordPress, 2714 votes (Typepad: 267 votes, Tie: 357 votes)

Week 6:
Windows 7 vs. Snow Leopard
WINNER: Windows 7, 3632 votes (Snow Leopard: 3278 votes, Tie: 121 votes)

Week 7:
TweetDeck vs. Seesmic Desktop
WINNER: TweetDeck, 3294 votes (Seesmic Desktop: 1055 votes, Tie: 260 votes)

Week 8:
Microsoft Office vs. Google Docs
WINNER: Microsoft Office, 1365 votes (Google Docs: 994 votes, Tie: 315 votes)

Week 9:
Apple iPhone vs. Google Android
WINNER: Google Android, 3323 votes (Apple iPhone: 1494 votes, Tie: 228 votes)

Week 10:
AT&T vs. Verizon
WINNER: Verizon, 1161 votes (AT&T: 538 votes, Tie: 118 votes)

Week 11:
Google vs. Bing
WINNER: Google, 2180 votes (Bing: 519 votes, Tie: 97 votes)

Week 12:
iPod Touch/iPhone vs. Nintendo DS vs. Sony PSP
WINNER: iPod Touch/iPhone, 704 votes (Sony PSP: 639 votes, Nintendo DS: 482 votes, Tie: 108 votes)

Week 13:
Digg vs. Reddit vs. StumbleUpon
WINNER: Digg, 14,762 votes (Reddit: 11,466 votes, StumbleUpon: 2507 votes, Tie: 1032 votes)

Week 14:
Old versus new Twitter retweets
WINNER: Old style retweets, 1625 votes (New style retweets: 699 votes, Tie: 227 votes)

Week 15:
Gmail vs. Outlook
WINNER: Gmail, 3684 votes (Outlook: 980 votes, Tie: 590 votes)

Week 16:
Boxee vs. Hulu
WINNER: Hulu, 626 votes (Boxee: 591 votes, Tie: 106 votes)

Week 17:
Nexus One vs. iPhone 3GS
WINNER: Nexus One, 6743 votes (iPhone 3GS: 2818 votes, Tie: 592 votes)

Week 18:
Foursquare vs. Yelp vs. Gowalla
WINNER: Foursquare, 1182 votes, (Yelp: 661 votes, Gowalla: 509 votes, Tie: 143 votes)

Week 19:
AIM vs. GTalk vs. FbChat
WINNER: GTalk, 2189 votes, (AIM: 1257 votes, FbChat: 511 votes, Tie: 203 votes)

Week 20:
Music Ownership vs. Music Subscription
WINNER: Ownership, 533 votes (Subscription: 299 votes, Tie: 237)

Week 21:
Match.com vs. PlentyofFish
WINNER: Plenty of Fish, 430 votes (Match.com: 334 votes, Tie: 187 votes)

Week 21:
Google Buzz vs. Facebook Vs. Twitter
WINNER: Facebook, 3353 votes (Twitter: 1828 votes, Google Buzz: 1298 votes, Tie: 651 votes)

The Science of Building Trust With Social Media

The Science of Building Trust With Social Media

trust imageThe Internet-era has made establishing trust an increasingly complicated issue. Our finely tuned ability to read facial expressions does not apply to e-mail, and emoticons are, at best, an imperfect substitute for sarcastic inflection (raise your hand if you’ve ever gotten into trouble for typing something that was meant to be a joke). So, how can we establish trust when our online identities are often little more than an avatar and few lines of text?

Fortunately, some in the scientific community have taken it upon themselves to help us through the confusion. Through both laboratory studies and field observation of people conversing over the Internet, scientists can survey when participants are likely to trust word-of-mouth or stab an absent colleague in the back. I sat down with a leading figure in this field, Professor Judy Olson, to talk about the essentials of building trust with digital communication.


The Psychology of Trust


Olson’s findings are based on a pillar of psychological research: People are willing to pass judgment, with or without good information. Where examples of one’s competence or reputation are lacking, people will construct whole profiles of another’s personality from what little information is available.

For instance, psychologists have found that when judging our own mistakes, we tend to blame the situation (traffic, a problem at work, an overbearing partner, etc.). When others make a mistake, we tend to blame their personality (they’re selfish, incompetent, uncaring, etc). Why? For ourselves, we have a full plate of information to link any series of situations to the cause of our misbehavior. For others, we see only the mistake itself; constructing a personality in explanation of that mistake is the shortest path from confusion to simplicity.

This fact leads Olson to one of her most important findings.


Responsiveness Is Key for Digital Communication


In e-mail, Linkedin and Facebook messages, much of the traditional markers of trust, such as voice intonation and body language, are hidden. Olson finds that when only text is available, participants judge trustworthiness based on how quickly others respond. So, for instance, it is better to respond to a long Facebook message “acknowledging” that you received the message, rather than to wait until there’s time to send a more thorough first message. Wait too long and you are likely to be labeled “unhelpful,” along with a host of other expletive-filled attributions the mind will happily construct.

Psychologically speaking, responsiveness makes it easier for others to attribute our misdeeds to the situation, rather than our personality. If you find keeping up with multiple inboxes difficult, you might consider having sites such as Linkedin and Facebook send e-mail alerts. Then, only archive the e-mail once the message has been responded to.

The same advice holds true for a medium such as Twitter, where one’s identity is represented by little more than a small square avatar and 140 characters of text. Earlier this month, when Southwest and director Kevin Smith went head to head, Southwest’s social media team jumped into the fray immediately with this tweet:

Southwest Air Tweet Image

While reactions to Southwest’s decision to eject Smith from his flight have been mixed, its immediate response on a Saturday night allowed the company to be perceived as committed to a controversial policy, rather than a much worse alternative: ambivalent to customer concerns.

There are also other great examples of responsiveness, for those of us not in charge of a major airline’s public relations. The Veggie Grill, an up-and-coming vegetarian restaurant in Southern California, responded to a customer’s request for a particular dish via Twitter:

Veggie Grill Tweet Image

Veggie Grill’s responsiveness seems to have paid off: @quarrygirl devoted an entire blog post to reviewing her meal. She sealed the experience with a statement that must have made Veggie Grill quite happy, “Please take my advice and get out to the veggie grill el segundo location NOW. and if you can’t go now, be sure to go ASAP.”


The Hierarchy of Trusted Communication


Not all forms of communication are created equal. For establishing trust, video is better than audio (with no video), and audio is better than a chat window. The logic of this hierarchy seems intuitive: People communicate as much, if not more, with how an idea is conveyed, than with what it said. Shifty eyes and raised shoulders can reveal anxiety; intonation can convey passion. The more non-substantive information the medium can convey, the more data a listener has to decide how trustworthy the speaker is.

For instance, when Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger wanted to thank his Twitter followers for sending useful ideas on how to reduce government waste, he went straight to video:

It’s all too common for politicians to send out a “thank you” statement to constituents. Schwarzenegger, with rolled-up sleeves and clearly unscripted message, took a giant leap forward on the scale on authenticity.

Schwarzenegger is not alone in the video-making department. In 2009, Domino’s Pizza president, Patrick Doyle, twice went in front of a camera to express his frustration, once to apologize for a nauseating employee YouTube prank, and again to pledge to make a tastier pizza. Below is a video of Doyle’s apology overlaid with a graph of user reaction. Notice how the confidence meter spikes and dips along with his inflection.

Curiously enough, the use of video has been absent from many of social media’s biggest crises. Facebook’s privacy blunder and Southwest’s aforementioned tiff with Kevin Smith both sought to redeem shattered trust with a disembodied message. When so much of our trust is based on body language and inflection, why not use video? What do you think, should Facebook and Southwest have used video to respond to critics?


Conclusion


Few, if any, educational institutes teach the art of proper digital communication. Most of us have simply made up an impromptu strategy and crossed our fingers in the hopes that disaster doesn’t strike. With a bit of help from our friends in the fields of psychology and information technology, we can apply the age-old intuitions of face-to-face conversation to whatever advances in technology come our way.

How the Resort Industry is Using Social Media

A growing number of resort and spa destinations are spreading their wings and reaching a wider customer base via social media. With the help of social networking platforms and niche bloggers, vacation spots are broadening their branding efforts from the sand to the slopes, and connecting with potential patrons they may not have reached through traditional advertising.

Here’s a look at some of the social strategies these getaway companies are employing and what we can learn from their success.


Online Dedication


Ski resorts in particular are taking advantage of online opportunities to communicate with their communities and reach beyond their usual demographic. World-famous mountain resort company Vail Resorts is so dedicated to new outreach methods that it has shifted 80% of its marketing budget to digital production and social media strategy. As part of the company’s efforts to keep skiers up to date, Vail Resorts has launched three new websites: Lindsey Is Epic, which chronicle’s Vail-based Olympian Lindsey Vonn’s skiing adventures, content portal buzz.snow.com, and the Heavenly resort’s “underground” tahoestash.com.

vail resort image

Vail Resorts Senior Corporate Communications Manager Amy Kemp says each website, along with both of the company’s Twitter accounts (@snowdotcom and @vailmtn) caters to a slightly different audience, but each group shares one thing — a love for skiing and snowboarding.

Park City, Utah’s largest ski franchise The Canyons began harnessing social media two years ago by launching an employee-run blog in conjunction with Twitter and Facebook accounts. The Canyons Communications Coordinator Hannah Bowling says the road to social media has been long but worth the ride.

“A lot of the people here higher up don’t necessary understand social media,” said Bowling.  ”But when I did a big contest giveaway on Facebook and they saw how our number of fans grew so quickly, we started thinking of future social media strategies that include more contests, making sure our blog is updated with information our customers want to see.”

In a similar fashion, Utah’s Park City Mountain Resort has broadened its reach by tapping into the mommy bloggersphere. The company’s Snow Mamas blog features five to six mommy bloggers who write about their ski trips. Each mama gives tips on dining, budget, lodging, and ski gear for the whole family.


Offline Action


Club Med Image

While building communication through social networking is important for the resort industry, the end goal is to get people to show up. Some destinations are achieving this through integrated campaigns. If executed effectively, online efforts more often than not lead to offline success.

The management team behind Vail Resorts took the offline component of their social media campaign to another level in January when they hosted the 2nd annual Snowcial, a conference that brings the ski industry and the tech world together.

The four-day event highlights activities for vacationers to do throughout the South Lake Tahoe. While attracting customers who wouldn’t normally travel to the area, Snowcial serves as an offline destination for people to share their personal and professional developments with social media.

In addition to giveaways and conferences, blogger retreats are becoming increasingly popular in the resort and spa business. In January, the world-famous vacation spa Club Med held a week-long food blogger camp to bring attention to the culinary delights of the chain resort. A group of eight well-known food bloggers stayed at Club Med Ixtapa Pacific and gave seminars, while others enjoyed the amenities and networked. At a discounted rate, the blogger guests paid for their rooms, activities and food. The foodies with families were able to have their kids stay for free.

Club Med Public Relations Director Kate Moeller says the event started a conversation between the establishment and people who wouldn’t normally go to Club Med.

“Someone who’s reading [a blog by David Lebowitz] isn’t a typical Club Med guest,” said Moeller. “But that person now knows about what Club Med has to offer from a culinary perspective.”

Moeller went on to say that social media is the only realm where anyone can do effective branding. “With the advertising space, you’re limited and you have limited funds,” she explained. “With the recession, everything is about deals. With social media we can actually brand and talk about things like the food blogger camp.”

“The food blogger camp was great because the cost of hosting it was pretty minimal,” said Moeller. “And the power of search and bloggers is undeniable. Because of the blogger event, people can read personal stories about Club Med versus an article in a magazine or an ad. If you Google ‘Club Med, food and wine,’ all of the bloggers’ names come up.”


Social Media Takeaways from the Getaway Industry


island resort image

With the click of a mouse being just as powerful, if not more so, than word of mouth, it’s apparent that social media efforts require dedication and consistency.

“There’s no escaping how much of an impact social media has on our business,” Bowling asserted. “I’ve heard people say ‘I just saw the Canyon’s Facebook page, or, ‘Hey, I need to tweet that I’m on the chairlift right now.’ It’s really important.”

When it comes to quality versus quantity, Bowling says “quality should take precedence in everything.” The Canyons’ take on social media is that growing with substance is more important than growing in numbers, because numbers don’t guarantee staying power.”

“We do want a lot of online followers, but we’re really only interested in communicating with people who are genuinely interested in what we have going on at The Canyons,” Bowling said.

Another important practice for resorts is to give their audiences what they want and expect, while offering a little something extra.

Moeller says Club Med customers expect ambiance and treatment of a certain caliber. By giving their guests a special taste of the food and wine at Club Med, the resort offers a taste of the good life with a twist. At the same time, it is important to heed the principles of Social Media 101: Transparency, authenticity, staying true to your brand, and strategizing to grow your business.

Above and beyond all, knowing your audience and knowing your social media contributors is paramount. Like with any individual or company leveraging social media, resort owners must accept that they’re no longer in complete control of their brand. However, research and attention to detail goes a long way in monitoring how a business is perceived.


The Dalai Lama Officially Joins Twitter

The Dalai Lama Officially Joins Twitter

More and more celebrity holdouts are joining the Twitter bandwagon. First Bill Gates started tweeting, then yesterday rapper Lil Wayne joined the service. Today, another famous figure has his own Twitter presence: The Dalai Lama.

There has been an @DalaiLama account for some time. In fact, a fake Dalai Lama fooled the media and the twitterverse early last year, which was part of what spurred the creation ofverified Twitter accounts.

This Dalai Lama is verified by Twitter, though — it is the real deal. Currently, the account is pulling albums and blog posts from his website and tweeting them via twitterfeedtwitterfeed, though we bet you’ll see real engagement later on. He also only has about 600 followers, but as the media picks up on his new-found Twitter presence, that will grow as well.

TwitterTwitter is simply one of the best ways for well-known personalities to spread their message to thousands or millions of people, but it looks like a conversation between Ev and the Dalai Lama was enough of a push to get him to finally join.

We look forward to future tweets from His Holiness.

Twitter Hits 50 Million Tweets Per Day

Twitter Hits 50 Million Tweets Per Day

New stats released today by Twitter reveal that users now send out over 50 million tweets per day. That means every second, 600 tweets fly through Twitter’s network.

As we reported two weeks ago, Twitter saw more than 1.2 billion tweets in January, or around 39 million tweets per day. These numbers came from Royal Pingdom and not Twitter itself, though.

The new numbers blow past Pingdom’s stats. Some of the highlights:

- In 2007, around 5000 tweets were sent per day.

- By 2008, the number grew to 300,000 tweets per day.

- By 2009, around 2.5 million tweets were sent through Twitter every single day.

- Tweet growth shot up by 1,400% in 2009, reaching 35 million tweets per day by the end of the year.

- As of now, Twitter sees 50 million tweets created per day.

These numbers are definitely noteworthy and provide evidence against the perception that Twitter is not growing

Twitter and Digicel Eliminate SMS Charges for Haiti

Twitter and Digicel Eliminate SMS Charges for Haiti

Twitter, as a platform, played a big role in the instantaneousspread of information following the earthquake that devastated Haiti in January. Today the microblogging site is officially supporting the exchange of real-time information and offering free SMS tweets for Digicel Haiti customers.

As of now, Digicel Haiti customers won’t incur charges for the SMS tweets they send and receive through Twitter’s 40404 short code. The bottom line is that Haitians can now experience an entirely free, mobile version of TwitterTwitter.

In Twitter’s blog post on the matter, Biz Stone writes:

“Kevin Thau and our mobile team have recently arranged free SMS tweets for Digicel Haiti customers. To activate the service, mobile phone users in Haiti can text follow @oxfam to 40404. Accounts are created on the fly and any account can be followed this way.”

Twitter’s move to make SMS tweets free of charge comes more than a month after the earthquake struck Port-au-Prince, but it’s yet another great example of how the web/tech industry is stepping up to help Haiti.

Google Buzz Not a Twitter or Facebook Killer, Says Google Exec

Google Buzz Not a Twitter or Facebook Killer, Says Google Exec

GMAIL USERS: You’re welcome to join the discussion over on Mashable’s Google Buzz account.

Google Buzz is not a rival to Facebook or Twitter, says Google exec Bradley Horowitz — instead he sees it as a platform for conversation, and hopes other services will be able to flow in and out of Buzz.

In an eWeek interview earlier this week, Horowitz, Google’s VP of product management, was asked whether Buzz was intended as a challenger to Twitter and Facebook. He replied:

“Absolutely not. Per what I just said, this is creating a new category of communication. It’s filling a niche, which is not currently met in the market. I think something unique is happening on Buzz that will continue to evolve. It’s hard to create a trend line or extrapolate too much from six days of use, but certainly conversation and the conversational Web is a place where Buzz has excelled. I think it is unique and offers a compelling interesting experience.”


Conversation Is Key


Horowitz also explained that Buzz goes beyond updating your status (like Twitter) or checking in (likeFoursquare) — it’s about engagement:

“It’s not just status-casting. It’s not just checking in. It’s really meaningful interactions around meaningful topics within Buzz and it’s reaching the right audience and people are engaged. That kind of value proposition is I think unique to Buzz. I’ve heard that again and again. In the realm of positive feedback, I think that people are finding that the conversational mode of buzz is very, very powerful and the quality of audience is also great.”


Buzz: An Open System


Google’s plan, it seems, is to create an open platform for social messaging, such that Google Buzz is integrated with services all around the web. Horowitz aims to create the “most open, well integrated, well behaving social network in the industry.”

This technical openness could create the kind of developer stampede that made Google Maps, Twitter and Flickr take off. The only unknown is whether technical openness could be in opposition to the private nature of our e-mail inboxes.

How do you use Twitter, Facebook and Buzz? Let us know in the comments.